Legal Opinion

United States v. Line Material Co.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 6, 1946No. Civ. A. 1696PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, District Judge.

As a boy in.grade school I many times pondered the answer to the problem then often discussed among younsters: What would happen if an irresistible force came into collision with an unbreakable and immovable object? The issue to be decided in the case at bar recalls that boyhood problem. when I consider how the ambit of the monopoly given to the owner of a patent and to his licensees by the patent laws comes into head-on collision with the ambit of the Sherman Anti-Trust Law, 15 U.S. C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note.

The eighth clause of Article I, Section 8, of the United States…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. Univis Lens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Line Material Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  3. United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
  4. United States v. Line Material Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. Line Material Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API