Mid-Continent Pipe Line Company v. Emerson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
Mid-Continent Pipe Line Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced proceedings for the condemnation of a pipe line right of way easement across forty acres of land owned by defendants. The .report of the commission fixed the amount of damages at $1010.40. Plaintiff demanded a jury trial and the jury assessed the value at $954.00, and a judgment was rendered accordingly. Plaintiff perfected its appeal from the order overruling its motion for a new trial.
PROPOSITION I
Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in excluding its evidence relative to the fair cash market…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- State Ex Rel. City of Ardmore v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Epperson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Eberle v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Jackvony v. PonceletSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
- McInturff v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.