Legal Opinion

Mid-Continent Pipe Line Company v. Emerson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1962No. 39749PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Mid-Continent Pipe Line Company, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, commenced proceedings for the condemnation of a pipe line right of way easement across forty acres of land owned by defendants. The .report of the commission fixed the amount of damages at $1010.40. Plaintiff demanded a jury trial and the jury assessed the value at $954.00, and a judgment was rendered accordingly. Plaintiff perfected its appeal from the order overruling its motion for a new trial.

PROPOSITION I

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in excluding its evidence relative to the fair cash market…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Ardmore v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. Epperson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Eberle v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Jackvony v. PonceletSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  4. McInturff v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. BowlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API