Legal Opinion

Abbott v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1999No. S-7390PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal raises questions about the timeliness of maritime claims filed by Nancy Abbott against her employer, the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS), nearly five years after she suffered a work-related injury. The superior court held that the three-year limitations statutes barred her claims. But Abbott’s delay in suing was due to her reliance upon a contractual provision which limited her to workers’ compensation for work-related injuries. She sued within a reasonable period after learning that, in an appeal not involving Abbott, we had declared…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Burnett v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Joseph F. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. American Dredging Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Blake J. v. State of Alaska, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services Philip Kaufman John Does 1-10 and Alexa J.Alaska Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Raper v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  4. Hooper v. Ebenezer Senior Services & Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Kaiser v. Umialik InsuranceAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API