Peckham v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from (A) a judgment in favor of defendant Blaney Matthews predicated upon the granting of said defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury (sec. 629, Code Civ. Proc.) in favor of plaintiff Peckham for $5,000 compensatory damages and $2,500 punitive damages, and in favor of plaintiff Sorrell for $3,000 compensatory damages and $2,500 punitive damages; and (B) a judgment of the trial court in favor of defendant Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc., predicated upon the granting of said defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, in an action to recover…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Harness v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Keefe v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- MacKie v. Ambassador Hotel & Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Reeves v. LapintaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dragna v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- United States v. BellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
- La Verne Ramsden v. W. UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.