Legal Opinion

Peckham v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1939No. Civ. 12166PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from (A) a judgment in favor of defendant Blaney Matthews predicated upon the granting of said defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury (sec. 629, Code Civ. Proc.) in favor of plaintiff Peckham for $5,000 compensatory damages and $2,500 punitive damages, and in favor of plaintiff Sorrell for $3,000 compensatory damages and $2,500 punitive damages; and (B) a judgment of the trial court in favor of defendant Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc., predicated upon the granting of said defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, in an action to recover…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harness v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Keefe v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. MacKie v. Ambassador Hotel & Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Reeves v. LapintaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dragna v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. United States v. BellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
  3. La Verne Ramsden v. W. UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API