In re the Marriage of Adams

In this domestic relations case, father appeals the trial court’s supplemental judgment, which, among other things, increased his monthly child support obligation.1 For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to follow the prescribed methodology when determining father’s income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a redetermination of father’s child support obligation, and we otherwise affirm.

Mother and father divorced in 2010. They have two children. The original…