Legal Opinion

MARRIAGE OF HARDIMAN AND HARDIMAN v. Human Resources

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 1995No. 90-0914; CA A84128PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Mother appeals from a judgment that reduced father’s child support obligation. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we reverse and remand.

The parties ended their five-year marriage in 1990. The trial court awarded wife custody of their child and ordered husband to pay $235 per month in child support. Later, mother, through the Support Enforcement Division, sought a modification of father’s child support obligation. The referee entered an order reducing father’s obligation to $175 per month. Mother appealed to the circuit court. ORS 416.427(6). At the hearing, the parties gave evidence that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of AinsworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API