McMurchie

Mother appeals the trial court’s supplemental judgment modifying child support; she asserts that the amount of child support the trial court ordered father to pay is too low. Father cross-appeals; he asserts that the amount is too high. Both parties contend that the trial court erred in calculating father’s presumed income.1 In addition, mother contends that, even if the trial court did not err in calculating father’s presumed income, it erred in failing to consider father’s other available resources — specifically, his portion of a $3.3 million lottery prize — when determining whether the…