Legal Opinion

Waynesville Transportation Co. v. Waynesville Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 13, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

MotioN to docket and dismiss, under Rule 17, the plaintiff’s appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtClaRK, C. J.

This case was tried at July Term, 1914, of Haywood. By agreement, the time was extended for serving the case and counter-case on appeal, which is a bad custom, and not to be encouraged. The plaintiff appellant served its case on defendant 9 September, 1914, and the defendant served its counter-case on the appellant 9 November, 1914, both being witbin the time of the extension agreed upon in writing. Neither ease was accepted by the other, and the transcript not being docketed here, the appellant now moves, on 10 December, to docket and dismiss under Eule 17.

This he was entitled to do. If the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Vivian v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Cozart v. Assurance Company.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Barber v. Justice.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Harrison v. . HoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chozen Confections, Inc. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Hawkins v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API