Legal Opinion

Double O Mining Co. v. Simrak

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1942No. 3375PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

ORR, J.:

Albert S. Simrak, a stockholder in the Double 0 Mining Company, a Nevada corporation, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, filed a petition in the Second judicial district court, in and for the county of Washoe, under the provisions of section 1634, Nevada Compiled Laws, praying said court to appoint a board of directors for the said Double 0 Mining Company, alleging that the said Double 0 Mining Company had failed and neglected to elect directors within six months after the time designated for its annual meeting. The Double 0 Mining Company answered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. WoodsIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Lawrence v. I. N. Parlier Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Italo Petroleum Corp. of America v. Producers Oil Corp. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  4. In re the Election of Directors of the Argus Printing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. WehrmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaui v. County of KauaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Miller v. WahyouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Miller v. WahyouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Schwabacher & Co. v. ZobristNevada Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API