Legal Opinion
Miller v. Wahyou
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1956No. 14902PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered by the United States District Court for the District *614of Nevada, denying appellants, who allegedly own an undivided interest in the assets of the Diamond-S Ranch Co. corporation, equitable relief against that corporation and its directors.1 Appellants urge that the District Court erred in not finding that they held such an interest in the assets and not ordering a distribution. Jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship, and the law of Nevada is applicable.
The Diamond-S Ranch Co. was incorporated in 1945. Corbari…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gratz v. ClaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Lawrence v. I. N. Parlier Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Bisbee v. Midland Linseed Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- McDonald v. HewlettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- K. King and G. Shuler Corp. v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Day v. MCC Acquisition, LCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2020
- G.A. Miller, W. W. Lord, Ralph Smeed, L.H. Staus and Jack Smeed, Trustees of John W. Smeed Estate v. Archie E. CorbariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Miller v. WahyouCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Schwabacher & Co. v. ZobristNevada Supreme Court · 1986