Legal Opinion

Estate of Smith v. Kansas Turnpike Authority

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1958No. 41,059PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The sole question presented is whether the Kansas Turnpike Authority is required to give a bond for costs as prescribed in G. S. 1957 Supp. 26-102 to perfect an appeal to the district court from an award of commissioners in an eminent domain proceeding.

Two contentions are presented by the Authority. First, that it is a state agency, and as such, is exempted by G. S. 1949, 60-2401 from giving such a bond. We are not persuaded the contention is meritorious. That statute provides in part:

“In any civil action hereafter brought in any district…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. American Book Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. State v. Boicourt Hunting Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. Auto Trunk Co. v. HahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  5. Jensen v. City of ChanuteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Callaway v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. State Highway Commission v. BullardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. State Highway Commission v. HembrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  5. Andres v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API