Estate of Smith v. Kansas Turnpike Authority
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
The sole question presented is whether the Kansas Turnpike Authority is required to give a bond for costs as prescribed in G. S. 1957 Supp. 26-102 to perfect an appeal to the district court from an award of commissioners in an eminent domain proceeding.
Two contentions are presented by the Authority. First, that it is a state agency, and as such, is exempted by G. S. 1949, 60-2401 from giving such a bond. We are not persuaded the contention is meritorious. That statute provides in part:
“In any civil action hereafter brought in any district…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. American Book Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Glover v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- State v. Boicourt Hunting Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Auto Trunk Co. v. HahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
- Jensen v. City of ChanuteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Callaway v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- State Highway Commission v. BullardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
- State Highway Commission v. HembrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Andres v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959