Legal Opinion

Bezy v. Loftus

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1991No. 88A05-9102-CV-54PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARPNACK, Judge.

Alfred Bezy, Jr., petitioned this court for leave to file this interlocutory appeal chal lenging the trial court's order preventing him from offering into evidence at trial a *967written plea agreement. We granted leave, and now, because we find that the order of the trial court is overly broad, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Bezy raises a single issue, which we restate as follows:

Is a written plea agreement admissible into evidence in an action for breach of the agreement?

The following facts are those necessary for our review. On October 29, 1983, Lof-tus allegedly…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. PenderIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Boles v. WeidnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. EdgmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Moulder v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Dickson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Klagiss v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Ragland v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Bezy v. LoftusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API