Ragland v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Gregory Ragland appeals the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentences after Ragland pleaded guilty to two counts of dealing in cocaine, a class B felony. We affirm.
ISSUE
Whether the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences.
FACTS
On March 22, 1994, a confidential informant contacted Anderson Police Department Detective Faust and stated that a cocaine purchase from 36 year-old Gregory Ragland was possible. The informant was given drug buy money and purchased .17 grams of cocaine from Ragland. On March 28, 1994, the same confidential…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Bezy v. LoftusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Howard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. HowardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997