Legal Opinion

Ragland v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1996No. 48A04-9604-CR-148PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DARDEN, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Gregory Ragland appeals the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentences after Ragland pleaded guilty to two counts of dealing in cocaine, a class B felony. We affirm.

ISSUE

Whether the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences.

FACTS

On March 22, 1994, a confidential informant contacted Anderson Police Department Detective Faust and stated that a cocaine purchase from 36 year-old Gregory Ragland was possible. The informant was given drug buy money and purchased .17 grams of cocaine from Ragland. On March 28, 1994, the same confidential…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bezy v. LoftusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Howard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. HowardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API