Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1998No. 34A04-9802-CR-48PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

This court accepted Vincent Wright’s petition for interlocutory appeal to consider whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss two pending charges of dealing in cocaine. We reverse.

Issue

Wright raises the following restated issue for our review: whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss two pending charges pursuant to a plea agreement he entered in another cause which provided that the State would not “file or proceed” on any charges of which it was aware at the time of the plea.

Facts and Procedural History

In 1994, Wright was charged…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Richardson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Crose v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Beiger Heritage Corp. v. MontandonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Epperson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Curtis A. Bethea v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Carol Pastor, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Evan v. Poe & Associates, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Griffin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Lineberry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API