Legal Opinion
City of Whitehall v. Khoury, 07ap-711 (3-25-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 25, 2008No. 07AP-711PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} This is an appeal by defendant-appellant, Raymond Khoury, from a judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court, Environmental Division, denying appellant's motion to dismiss in which appellant alleged that an ordinance regulating the use of outdoor signs was unconstitutional.
{¶ 2} Appellant is the owner of a restaurant in Whitehall. On September 5, 2006, plaintiff-appellee, City of Whitehall, cited appellant for various violations of the city code, including the display of prohibited signs, in violation of Whitehall City Code Sections1127.06(a)(8) and (a)(9). According to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Home Builders Ass'n v. City of BeavercreekOhio Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PreztakOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. FryeOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. TownsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. Perry, 89819 (5-15-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Alliance v. CarboneOhio Court of Appeals · 2009