Legal Opinion
State v. Preztak
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 2009No. 91244PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank D. Celebrezze Jr., Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Debra Preztak, appeals her theft conviction. After a thorough review of the record, and for the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
{¶ 2} On June 25, 2007, a Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted appellant on one count of theft under R.C. 2913.02(A)(2), a third-degree felony. 1 On November 21, 2007, appellant filed a motion to dismiss based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. Appellant also filed a motion to suppress her statements to the police. On February 6, 2008, the trial court held a hearing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. MahoneOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State ex rel. Steffen v. Court of Appeals, First Appellate Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Cleveland v. GieringOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Ortega-MartinezOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.