White v. Wadhams
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kent; Brown, J. Bill by Marl S. White against Frederick N. Wad-hams and the Hastings City Bank for an accounting. The State Savings Bank of Ann Arbor intervened, claiming to be a bona fide holder of a negotiable instrument. From a decree for plaintiff, intervening defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
Plaintiff filed his bill to secure an accounting of a farm partnership existing during the summer of 1916 between himself and the defendant Frederick N. Wadhams. The plaintiff prevailed, and the decree provides that the defendant Wadhams owes the plaintiff $492.24 and interest, and, in addition, *383plaintiff was given an attorney fee of $75, payable out of the partnership funds. The findings and the decree both state that a certificate of deposit was issued to the order of the defendant Wadhams, December 18, 1916, by the defendant Hastings City Bank for $950 and that this fund was the sole…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Kirkwood v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Tripp v. CurteniusMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Murray v. Third Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Pierce v. State National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Trader v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Miller v. Commercial State Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- White v. WadhamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Coffey v. Day & Night Nat. BankDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1926
- Bumb v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.