Legal Opinion

Remlinger v. the Grange Store

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1947No. 30116PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAbel, J.

This cause was heretofore before this court on respondents’ motion to strike appellant’s statement of facts on the ground that the statement was not filed with the clerk of the superior court within the ninety-day period prescribed by Rule 9 (1), Rules of Supreme Court, 18 Wn. (2d) 9-a. Respondents’ motion was granted in State ex rel. Grange Store v. Riddell, ante p. 134, 177 P. (2d) 78.

The transcript contains the complaint, answer, reply, and decree of the trial judge, in which he made findings, entered an injunction, and gave a judgment for damages.

The only question before us is whether the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Grange Store v. RiddellWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Kelly v. St. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. McGregor v. HollingsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woodard v. KuhnWashington Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API