Legal Opinion
City of Richmond v. Deans
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1930No. 2900PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
We agree with the learned judge below 1 that this case is controlled by the decisions of the Supreme Court in Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U. S. 60, 38 S. Ct. 16, 62 L. Ed. 149, L. R. A. 1918C, 210, Ann. Cas. 1918A, 1201, and Harmon v. Tyler, 273 U. S. 668, 47 S. Ct. 471, 71 L. Ed. 831, reversing Tyler v. Harmon, 158 La. 439; 104 So. 200. To the same effect as these Supreme Court decisions is the Virginia decision of Irvine v. City of Clifton Forge, 124 Va. 781, 97 S. E. 310, which follows them. Attempt is made to distinguish the ease at bar from these cases on the ground that the zoning ordinance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Tyler v. HarmonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Irvine v. City of Clifton ForgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
3Cited by11 opinions
- ROLAX Et Al. v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO. Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- City of Birmingham v. MonkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Banks v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY AND CTY. OF SFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. TunstallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Monk v. City of BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.