Legal Opinion
Earl Parris, Jr. v. 3M Company, et al.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided March 20, 2026No. 4:21-cv-00040Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION EARL PARRIS, JR. Individually, and on behalf of a Class of persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 4:21-CV-40-TWT 3M COMPANY, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This is an environmental contamination action. It is before the Court on Defendants 3M Company (“3M”), E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“du Pont”), the Chemours Company (“Chemours”), and Daikin America, Inc.’s (“Daikin’s”) Motion to Exclude Opinions of Steven Amter [Doc. 863]. For the reasons stated below, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- David Owen v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporation and the Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.