Legal Opinion

Smith v. Grange Mutual Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 88PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On May 1, 1922, plaintiff applied' to a local agent, Anderson A. Miner, the secretary of the Luther Grange, for insurance in the defendant company on the buildings on her farm property in Osceola county in the sum of $3,350 on a blank pro vided by defendant for that purpose. The requisite fees were paid. The application and fees were sent to W. M. Coon at Roscommon, the secretary of the defendant company. A policy was issued by Mr. Coon on May 5th, and mailed to E. B. Follett, the president of the company, at Hale, for his signature thereto. The policy was afterwards received by plaintiff,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. AuerbachMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Towle v. Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Castner v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Johnson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lee v. Evergreen Regency CooperativeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Cummings v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Anderson v. Harry’s Army Surplus, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API