Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Harry’s Army Surplus, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1982No. Docket 53743, 53744PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCynar, J.

Following a jury trial in Wayne County Circuit Court, the jury found that defendants Harry’s Army Surplus, Inc. (hereinafter Harry’s), and The Coleman Company, Inc. (hereinafter Coleman), were negligent and that their negligence was the proximate cause of injuries sustained by plaintiff. Plaintiff’s damages were found to be $1,200,000 and plaintiff was found not to be contributorily negligent. Defendants appeal as of right.

On November 13, 1975, plaintiff, then 18 years of age, and his companions, Larry Yerman and Michael Evinauf, visited defendant Harry’s to purchase equipment for a camping…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. OliphantMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Smith v. Grange Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Weeks v. FeltnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Estate of Hunter v. General Motors Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  3. May v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Gorelick v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Rittenhouse v. ErhartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API