Legal Opinion

Randolph v. PowerComm Construction, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 25, 2014No. Civil Case No. PWG-13-1696PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the Maryland Wage and Hour Law (“MWHL”), alleging that they worked in excess of forty hours per week as traffic controllers for Defendant Power-Comm Construction, Inc. (“PowerComm”) but were not paid sufficient overtime wages. Defendants have moved for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiffs were independent contractors and not employees covered by the FLSA and MWHL. Plaintiffs respond that, even though they were classified as independent contractors by…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McFeeley v. Jackson Street Entertainment, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
  2. Arnulfo Cabrera, Elmer Callejas, and Yovani Gutierrez v. Tobar Construction, Inc., et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
  3. Baylor v. Homefix Custom Remodeling CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  4. Beck v. Curaleaf, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  5. Bobb v. FinePoints Private Duty Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API