Tyrone Gaynell Conelly v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.
A jury found appellant, Tyrone Gaynell Conelly, guilty of driving while intoxicated [DWI], and, after appellant pleaded true to a DWI enhancement, the trial court assessed punishment at 180 days’ confinement. In three points of error, appellant contends that (1) the evidence was legally insufficient to show that he operated a motor vehicle; (2) the trial court erred in admitting his booking photo, which he claims was unduly prejudicial; and (3) the use of a 1985 conviction for enhancement purposes violated constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Gigliobianco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Craig Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
- Crider v. Bobby LumpkinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
- Fred Schneider v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
- Joe Antonio Luna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2021
- Juan Cerda Alvarado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.