Legal Opinion

Tyrone Gaynell Conelly v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 7, 2014No. 01-12-00398-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice.

A jury found appellant, Tyrone Gaynell Conelly, guilty of driving while intoxicated [DWI], and, after appellant pleaded true to a DWI enhancement, the trial court assessed punishment at 180 days’ confinement. In three points of error, appellant contends that (1) the evidence was legally insufficient to show that he operated a motor vehicle; (2) the trial court erred in admitting his booking photo, which he claims was unduly prejudicial; and (3) the use of a 1985 conviction for enhancement purposes violated constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Gigliobianco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Craig Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
  2. Crider v. Bobby LumpkinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
  3. Fred Schneider v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. Joe Antonio Luna v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2021
  5. Juan Cerda Alvarado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API