Legal Opinion
Godtfredsen v. Banner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 5, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-1555PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
This is an action in which plaintiffs Wagn Ole Godtfredsen and its assignee, Leo Pharmaceutical Products Ltd., seek judicial review of a determination by defendant Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks regarding formulation of the counts to be considered in a patent office interference proceeding. 1 Peter Bamberg, et al. and its assignee, Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., have intervened as defendants in this action, based upon their interest as junior party in the interference proceeding declared between Bamberg and plaintiffs. Presently…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Williams Mfg. Co. v. United Shoe MacH. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. QuiggCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation, a Georgia Corporation, Counter-Defendant v. Kai Lieberam, Counter-ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark OfficeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. QuiggCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Hitachi Metals, Ltd. v. QuiggDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.