Legal Opinion

Ross v. Pentair Flow Technologies, LLC

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 3, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02690Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS TONY B. ROSS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 19-2690-SAC PENTAIR FLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER After the plaintiff Tony B. Ross (“Ross”) filed his amended employment discrimination complaint asserting actions under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (“Title VII”),

42 U.S.C. § 1981

(“§ 1981”), and state common-law retaliation, the defendant Pentair Flow Technologies, Inc. (“Pentair”) filed its Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss with supporting memorandum. ECF## 13 and 14. On the plaintiff’s count one action…

2Cases cited50 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.