Legal Opinion

Barela v. Locer

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1985No. 15527PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

Plaintiffs Robert S. and Viola Barela sued defendant George B. Locer for breach of contract, alleging that Locer had violated a realty purchase agreement containing an option of first refusal to mineral rights in the realty. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Locer, but allowed the Barelas to amend their complaint to allege mistake and misrepresentation, and to ask for reformation of contract. After a bench trial, the court entered judgment for Locer. The Barelas appeal and we reverse.

On May 7, 1970, the Barelas, as purchasers, and Locer, as seller,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Continental Life Ins. Co. v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sanchez v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Master Builders, Inc. v. CabbellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Vanzandt v. HeilmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Northcutt v. McPhersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Czarobski v. LataIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Barela v. LocerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Czarobski v. LataIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. MRC Permian Company and Joe Foran v. Three Rivers Operating Company and Three Rivers Acquisition LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API