Legal Opinion

E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Cantine Rallo, S.P.A.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 17, 2005No. 1:04-cr-05153PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 72-303(c) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)

WANGER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

E. & J. Gallo Winery (“Plaintiff’ or “E & J Gallo”) filed a complaint for trademark infringement in this court on January 22, 2004. Doc. 1. After the summons and complaint were allegedly served upon Cantine Rallo (“Defendant”) by service on January 28, 2004, on a designated representative under 15 U.S.C. § 1051(e), default was entered on March 19, 2004. See Doc. 6. The district court granted Plaintiffs proposed judgment of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Foc Financial Ltd. Partnership v. National City Commercial Capital Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2009
  2. Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund v. Bristol Manor Healthcare Center, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Verizon California Inc. v. OnlineNIC, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  4. C.R. v. PLB Management LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  5. Hansber v. Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API