Legal Opinion
Verizon California Inc. v. OnlineNIC, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 27, 2009No. Case C 08-2832 JF (RS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER 1 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR CONTEMPT SANCTIONS AND FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
[re: doc. nos. 60 & 113]
JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Verizon California, Inc., Verizon Trademark Services LLC, and Verizon Licensing Company (collectively, “Verizon”) move for the imposition of civil contempt sanctions against Defendant OnlineNIC, Inc. (“OnlineNIC”) for its alleged violations of the Modified Injunction and Receiver Order entered by this Court on May 13, 2009. 2 Verizon alleges eleven counts of contempt, on the basis of which it seeks monetary sanctions and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State of New York and Erin D. Crotty v. Kevan M. Green and Polymer Applications, Inc., Docket No. 04-4070-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor. Nancy Knupfer, Trustee v. John Lindblade, in Re Thomas James Dyer, Debtor, John Lindblade v. Nancy Knupfer, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scott Rigsby v. Godaddy Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Banga v. KaniosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Facebook, Inc. v. OnLineNic IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Roberts v. KJ Win, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025