Legal Opinion
Kutik v. Taylor
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrank Composto, J.
In this shareholder’s derivative action brought in the right of American Telephone and Telegraph Company ("A T & T”) against its directors and against five of its “subsidiaries” (which are referred to by defendants as “operating companies” but which shall, for the sake of uniformity of designation, be referred to herein as "subsidiaries”), the defendants Robert D. Lilley and AT&T move for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 1) (defense founded on documentary evidence) and CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) (failure to state a cause of action).
The complaint…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Blaustein v. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Everett v. PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Jacobs v. Monaton Realty Investment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Lewis v. Village of DepositNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Greenberg v. Acme Folding Box Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- Levenson v. Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979