Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Acme Folding Box Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.
In this stockholders’ derivative action, the defendants move to dismiss the lawsuit on the following grounds:(1) The plaintiff does not have the legal capacity to sue (CPLR 3211 subd [a], par 3) either as an individual, or in the name of the estate of Joseph L. Greenberg, or as a representative of other shareholders in a class action, or on behalf of the corporation in a derivative capacity; and(2) The complaint fails to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211 subd [a], par 7). The defendants also seek, in the alternative, a protective order precluding the plaintiff from continuing her inspection…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Everett v. PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Diamond v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Taylor v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lewis v. S. L. & E., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Irene Jacobs and Gabriel Galef v. Joe A. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Winter v. BernsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1991
- Lincoln First Bank, N. A. v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- DiPace v. FigueroaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.