Legal Opinion

In THE MATTER OF McDOW

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 30, 1987No. 22686PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney disciplinary matter. The Hearing Panel recommended respondent receive a private reprimand. The Executive Committee adopted the Hearing Panel’s findings and conclusions; however, it recommended a sanction of a thirty (30) day suspension. We find the appropriate sanction to be a public reprimand.

In October of 1984 respondent filed a divorce action on behalf of a client. Respondent, who was single, admits he, during his representation, engaged in an adulterous relationship with his client, who was at the time separated from her husband. Consequently, the family court granted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of PadgettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ZeilingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. In re ParrottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Matter of RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API