Legal Opinion

Holdner v. Columbia County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 1, 1993No. 89-21-75; CA A74899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for breach of contract and inverse condemnation. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the breach of contract claim. ORCP 47. At trial, it held for defendant on the inverse condemnation claim. We affirm.

Plaintiffs first assignment of error is directed at the trial court’s ruling regarding the inverse condemnation claim. Plaintiff owns land adjacent to Dutch Canyon Road. In 1986, a landslide caused a portion of the road to slide onto his property. Before reconstruction began, defendant initiated legalization proceedings pursuant to ORS…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wiggins v. Barrett & Associates, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bankus v. City of BrookingsOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. City of Molalla v. COOVER ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Josephine CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Morrow County Health District v. Account Control Consultant Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. WitherspoonWashington Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API