Legal Opinion

Trainor v. Phila. & R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1890No. 156PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL BY DEPENDANT FROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS NO.'2 OP PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 156 July Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 577 December Term 1887, C. P. No. 2. On January 30,1888, Peter Trainor brought trespass against the Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company and George DeB.

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY DEPENDANT FROM THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS NO.'2 OP PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 156 July Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 577 December Term 1887, C. P. No. 2. On January 30,1888, Peter Trainor brought trespass against the Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company and George DeB. Keim and others, receivers of said company, to recover damages for injuries received from the fall of a coal derrick upon him, averring in his statement of claim that said “ derrick was so carelessly, negligently and improperly constructed as to be dangerous to employees,” and that the “defendant carelessly,…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion,

Mr. Justice McCollum:

In considering the portion of the charge which constitutes the first specifications of error, regard must be had to what precedes it. The learned judge had correctly stated who were fellow-servants, and if the company desired specific instructions on the point of the relation of McFadden to the appellee, *158under their employment, it should have requested them. In the absence of a request for them, their omission cannot be regarded as reversible error.

The question whethei McFadden was competent to superintend the work of taking down the pole was fairly raised by his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. SeifertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  2. Bolton v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Weger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace-Car Co. v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1893
  2. Foster v. National Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Winslow v. Commercial Building Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Barto v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Toledo Brewing & Malting Co. v. BoschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API