City of Allentown v. Local 302, International Ass'n of Fire Fighters
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
The Commonwealth Court has determined that under the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Law, 53 P.S. §§ 881.-101-881.501, a municipality may not maintain more than one pension system for its firemen. Consequently, the court held invalid the actions of the Appellant, City of Allentown, closing enrollment in the City’s Paid Firemen’s Pension Fund (Pension Fund) as of July 8, 1976 and mandating enrollment of all firemen hired after that date in the Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement System (Retirement System). Because of the importance of the question for municipalities…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare v. Forbes Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Harvey v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Association of Pennsylvania State College & University Faculties v. State System of Higher EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Hospital Ass'n of Pennsylvania v. MacLeodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. District Council 33Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- City of Butler v. City of Butler Police DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Police Pension Fund Ass'n Board v. HessCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- City of Philadelphia v. District Council 33Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Rybak v. State Employees' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.