Marston v. AT & T Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SPENCER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant AT & T’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) and failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
I
On December 21, 2001, Lisa Marston filed a Charge of Discrimination with the EEOC claiming gender discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. On April 24, 2002, 124 days after Ms. Marston filed her charge, the EEOC issued a Notice of Right to Sue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Veliaminov v. P.S. Business ParksDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- White v. University of Maryland Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022