Legal Opinion

Automatic Signal Advertising Co. v. Babcock

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 26, 1926No. 25,088PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

By this action, plaintiff seeks to obtain judgment permanently enjoining the defendant, as commissioner of highways of Minnesota, from in any manner interfering with certain stop and go signal devices which it is and which it proposes to place and install in and upon the state trunk highway within the limits of the cities and villages through which such highway passes under permits given it by the governing bodies of such municipalities. Upon a hearing of motions for judgment upon the pleadings, the court denied the injunction and dismissed the action, from which order plaintiff appealed.

Secti…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Hilton v. VollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Bidlingmeyer v. City of Deer LodgeMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Maguire v. Village of CrosbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Lundstrom v. GiacomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Murphy v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API