Legal Opinion
Maguire v. Village of Crosby
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 5, 1929No. 27,436PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
A jury awarded damages for injury to plaintiff’s property caused by a change of grade of the abutting street, which on July 21, 1927, was duly designated by the state highway commissioner as trunk highway No. 2. On August 15, 1927, by resolution, the village council of defendant approved the plans, and specifications of the commissioner for the construction of said highway in that street, and consented to the change of grade thereby provided.
The sole question presented…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jordan v. City of BenwoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
- Vanderburgh v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- City of Chicago v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Sallden v. City of Little FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Stack v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Paul v. FaricySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Greenwood v. Evergreen Mines Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Electric Short Line Terminal Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Miles v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Collins v. Village of RichfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.