State v. Hassman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
GILLETTE, P. J.,
Pro Tempore
Defendant seeks reversal of two separate convictions, one for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, ORS 164.135, and one for escape in the second degree. ORS 162.315. We affirm.
Defendant first argues that his motion for a mistrial should have been granted in his trial for, inter alia, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. He argues that a prosecution witness’ statement implied that defendant had been incarcerated and thereby prejudiced him by improperly interjecting other crimes or bad acts evidence into the trial.
A motion for mistrial is directed to a trial court’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. PalaiaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ForeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. MetcalfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986