Legal Opinion

State v. Hassman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 9, 1986No. 85-123, 85-179; CA A35724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, P. J.,

Pro Tempore

Defendant seeks reversal of two separate convictions, one for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, ORS 164.135, and one for escape in the second degree. ORS 162.315. We affirm.

Defendant first argues that his motion for a mistrial should have been granted in his trial for, inter alia, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. He argues that a prosecution witness’ statement implied that defendant had been incarcerated and thereby prejudiced him by improperly interjecting other crimes or bad acts evidence into the trial.

A motion for mistrial is directed to a trial court’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. PalaiaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. State v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ForeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State v. MetcalfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API