Legal Opinion

Sam and Mac, Inc. v. Treat

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2003No. 71A05-0204-CV-171PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Plaintiff, Sam and Mac, Inc. (SMI), appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Appel-leo-Defendant, James T. Treat (Treat).

We affirm.

ISSUE

SMI raises two issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as follows: whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Treat.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Anthony L. Gruda and Sharon R. Gruda (the "Grudas") owned and operated Gruda Enterprises, Inc. (Gruda Enterprises), which in turn operated The Kitchen Works, a kitchen supply business. 1 On March 5,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gilliana v. PaniaguasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Figg v. Bryan Rental Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Summit Account & Computer Service, Inc. v. RJH of Florida, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Belcher v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. French-Tex Cleaners, Inc. v. Cafaro Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. In Re Western Iowa Limestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Tracy v. MorellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Dennis Larson, Rose Real Estate, Inc., and Diversified Commercial Real Estate v. Peter N. KaraganIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API