Legal Opinion
Gilliana v. Paniaguas
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 16, 1999No. 45A03-9805-CV-237PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Defendants Robert Gilliana and Robert Gilliana d/b/a Gilliana Pool Service (collectively “Gilliana”) appeal the jury verdict finding in favor of John S. Paniaguas and Kathy Paniaguas (collectively “Paniag-uases”) for breach of contract and fraudulent control of the Paniaguases’ property.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Gilliana raises three issues for our review which we restate as follows:
1. Whether Gilliana’s placement and construction of the Paniaguases’ swimming pool was a material breach of contract or an oral modification.
2. Whether Kathy Paniaguas was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holloway v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Huff v. BIOMET, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Midland-Guardian Co. v. United Consumers Club, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Skweres v. Diamond Craft Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Nationscredit Commercial Corp. v. Grauel Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Whitaker v. BrunnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Tobin v. RumanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- American Heritage Banco, Inc. v. McNaughtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Northern Elec. Co., Inc. v. TormaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dennis Larson, Rose Real Estate, Inc., and Diversified Commercial Real Estate v. Peter N. KaraganIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.