Russell v. Dennison
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, County of San Joaquin. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court:
This is an action to recover damages for a malicious prosecution. The plaintiff recovered judgment for seven thousand dollars, from which and from an order denying their motion for a new trial the defendants have appealed.
1. We cannot consider the points made upon the instructions to the jury, for the reason that the statement fails to show that any exceptions were taken to them. The minutes of the Clerk, if they were brought into the record, would not aid the appellants in this respect.
For the same reason we cannot consider the propriety of the questions which were addressed to…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Singleton v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Sturges v. Charles L. Harney, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Sandoval v. Southern California Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Gorman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.