Legal Opinion

Whiteplume v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1994No. 93-212PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellant Adolph Francis Whiteplume brings this appeal pursuant to a conditional plea agreement. 1 Appellant was originally convicted of first-degree sexual assault on June 21, 1991. On November 10, 1992, this court, holding that the testimony of the investigating police officer improperly vouched for the victim’s credibility, issued an opinion reversing appellant’s conviction and remanding for a new trial. Whiteplume v. State, 841 P.2d 1332 (Wyo.1992). Upon remand, in addition to refiling the first-degree sexual assault charge, the state filed a kidnapping charge. Appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. United States v. Pedro Saade, United States of America v. Carlos Zenon RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miranda Rose Mraz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Merchant v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lovato v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Crozier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API