State v. Icard
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
In determining whether Fourth Amendment protections apply to a search or seizure by the police, we consider whether, under the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person would have felt that she was not free to decline the police request or otherwise ter*79mínate the encounter with them.1 Here, because we find that a reasonable person in Defendant Lori Shannon Icard’s position would not have felt “free to . . . terminate the encounter” with the police, we hold that the police search of her purse was governed by the Fourth Amendment. However, noting that Defendant also…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. IsenhourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. IcardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009