Legal Opinion

State v. Icard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 2008No. COA07-610PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In determining whether Fourth Amendment protections apply to a search or seizure by the police, we consider whether, under the totality of the circumstances, a reasonable person would have felt that she was not free to decline the police request or otherwise ter*79mínate the encounter with them.1 Here, because we find that a reasonable person in Defendant Lori Shannon Icard’s position would not have felt “free to . . . terminate the encounter” with the police, we hold that the police search of her purse was governed by the Fourth Amendment. However, noting that Defendant also…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. IsenhourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. IcardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. IcardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API