Legal Opinion

State v. Icard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 2009No. 236A08PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

This case presents the question whether a police encounter with defendant triggered defendant’s Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable seizure. We conclude that a reasonable person in defendant’s position would not have felt free to refuse an officer’s request to search her purse or otherwise terminate the encounter under the totality of circumstances that here included the officer’s initiation of the encounter, his declaration to defendant and her companion that he was investigating drug crimes and prostitution, his call for a backup officer, his persistence when…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. MacKeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. KnudsenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. State v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API