Legal Opinion

Dietrick v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 23, 2014No. Case No. 13-cv-05016-JSTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re: ECF No. 31

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge

In this action for claims of alleged violations of federal and California labor laws, Defendant Securitas moves for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment on all claims asserted in Plaintiff Michael Deatrick’s1 Amended Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

A. The Parties and Claims

Plaintiff Michael Deatrick is a former employee of Defendant Securitas Services USA, Inc. (“Securitas”), a national provider of security services.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlino v. CHG Medical Staffing, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Costa v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. Elgindy v. AGA Service CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API