Legal Opinion
Long v. Owens Corning
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 14, 2002No. Civ.A. 01-2450-KHVPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Sue Long brings age discrimination claims against Owens Corning under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 25) filed June 6, 2002. For reasons stated below, the Court sustains defendant’s motion.
Summary Judgment Standard
Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conrad v. Board of Johnson County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Armstrong v. Ennis Business Forms of Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022