Legal Opinion

People v. Crandall

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1929No. Docket No. 1840PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the crime of involuntary manslaughter, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

From the evidence the jury would have been justified in concluding that the essential facts in the case were that as defendant was operating an automobile southerly on a public thoroughfare at an intersection of said thoroughfare with another public highway, by reason of the failure of defendant to exercise due care and circumspection in the premises, the automobile operated by him collided with another automobile traveling in a northerly direction and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LewandowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. WittyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. LedererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. HoraceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. People v. GuernseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Saied v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. People v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API