Legal Opinion

In Re Engelhardt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1962No. Docket 27, Calendar 49,186PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.

By order striking their appearance and answer, owners of platted lots which do not adjoin a park dedicated by the proprietors of the plat to public purposes were denied their day in court to voice opposition to a petition for its vacation filed by owners of lots adjoining it. This proceeding for vacation of a public park is authorized by statute. CL 1948 and CLS 1956, § 560.59 et seq., as amended by PA 1958, No 101 (Stat Ann 1953 Rev and Stat Ann 1961 Cum Supp § 26.489 et seq.). The statute provides:

“Any person owning any land immediately adjoining that part which it is proposed to alter or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Grand Rapids Booming Co. v. JarvisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Kirchen v. RemengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Kimball v. HomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Schurtz v. WescottMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. BeldeanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Wemple Ex Rel. Dang v. DahmanHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API