In Re Engelhardt
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSouris, J.
By order striking their appearance and answer, owners of platted lots which do not adjoin a park dedicated by the proprietors of the plat to public purposes were denied their day in court to voice opposition to a petition for its vacation filed by owners of lots adjoining it. This proceeding for vacation of a public park is authorized by statute. CL 1948 and CLS 1956, § 560.59 et seq., as amended by PA 1958, No 101 (Stat Ann 1953 Rev and Stat Ann 1961 Cum Supp § 26.489 et seq.). The statute provides:
“Any person owning any land immediately adjoining that part which it is proposed to alter or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Grand Rapids Booming Co. v. JarvisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Kirchen v. RemengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Kimball v. HomanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Schurtz v. WescottMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. BeldeanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Wemple Ex Rel. Dang v. DahmanHawaii Supreme Court · 2004