Legal Opinion
Hanenkratt v. Hamil
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 30, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF THE CASE.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error in the district court of the first judicial district, in the county of Logan and Territory of Oklahoma, for the recovery of certain real estate described in her certain petition, filed in said court February 3, 1898, which petition is in words and figures as follows, to-wit:
"In the district court, first judicial district, Territory of Oklahoma, in and for Logan county.
"Nellie M. Hamil, plaintiff, v. D. V. Hanenkratt, defendant.
PETITION.
"The above named plaintiff, Nellie M. Hamil, for cause…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Magill v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Babbitt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. VancantIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- McPhail & Co. v. HyattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Modlin v. North-Western Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Emmerson v. BotkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Wade v. Crouch and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Keller v. HawkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Coody v. CoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.